The Pluralism Diaries by Rav Goni

Who's a rabbi?

Monday, June 26, 2006
 
The Hon. Moshe Katzav, President of the State of Israel, is the focus of a small storm. He confided to an interviewer that he could not call a Reform rabbi by the title "rabbi." He reserves this title for Orthodox clergy exclusively.

When Rabbi Eric Yoffie, head of the Union for Reform Judaism, was told of Pres. Katzav's policy he finally realized that in all his previous - and cordial - meetings with him, President Katzav had, indeed, always managed to work around addressing him directly as "rabbi." He determined to take a stand to defend his position and the dignity of over a million Jews who accept him as their rabbinic leader. So he declared that he would not meet with Pres. Katzav until the President changed his policy.

Demonstrations have taken place in front of the president's residence, calling on him to act in a manner befitting his office, which is supposed to serve as a unifying force for all Jewry. President Katzav has defended himself by saying that he is merely following State policy and that Israel does not recognize the Reform and Conservative movements as legitimate versions of Judaism. This is a half-truth. While non-Orthodox branches of Judaism are disenfranchised in the one country that is supposed to be the homeland for all Jews, both Reform and Conservative rabbis have been officially referred to with their rabbinic titles in various documents and in various contexts.

There are a number of ironies attached to this episode. It has been pointed out that even Orthodox rabbis in America have recently been dismissed by Israeli authorities. The Chief Rabbinate recently decided that most Orthodox rabbis in the US are not to be trusted with regard to the conversions they perform. One reporter sees these phenomena as indicative of the growing chasm developing between Israel and thr Diaspora (- see "Snubbed by Zion," by Benjamin Balint, WSJ, June 9, 2006). In this view Israel is increasingly sure of itself and dismissive of any Jewish legitimacy outside its borders (whatever they may be).

While this may be partly true, I think there is another aspect to this problem. The real root of the problem is the inability of Israelis to fully appreciate a pluralistic approach to Jewish life. This can be seen from two examples: With regard to the Katzav/Yoffie conflict it is surely noteworthy that Rabbi Zvi Hersh Weinreb, Executive Director of the Union of Orthodox Congregations - not someone who is soft on Reform Judaism - has openly rejected Pres. Katzav's position. He has stated clearly that Rabbi Yoffie should be shown the respect of being addressed as "rabbi." Rabbi Weinreb is no less committed to Orthodoxy than Pres. Katzav. The difference is that Rabbi Weinreb has learned to work within a pluralistic Jewish society. Pres. Katzav has not. (Of course, the Orthodox monopoly in Israel, which repeatedly defeats and prevents any pluralistic efforts, also allows the Orthodox camp to exert tremendous political pressure on the society to maintain this situation, pressure to which even the President of Israel is not immune.)

Another indicator of the limited nature of the Israeli religious imagination is reported in the Israeli paper, Haaretz ("In a Sea of Possibilities, the Secular Find an Anchor in the Halakhah," Yair Ettinger, June 23, 2006). The article describes the rise of interest among secular Israelis in finding directives for their lives through traditional Jewish law (halakhah). The point of the article is that in a post-modern world of infinite possibilities some people have gone beyond the vague notions of spiritual renewal to seek definitive answers that will direct their lives.

One of the popular addresses to which these Israelis turn is the writer Adam Barukh, a long-time figure on the Israeli cultural scene who now writes a weekly column of "responsa" - halakhic answers to real-life questions - for the paper Ma`ariv. When asked why so many turn to him for his advice, he answers, "This says something very serious about the Orthodox rabbis."

But if Israelis don't feel comfortable with the Orthodox, why don't they turn to the other streams? Adam Barukh notes, "Many of those who send a question live in emotional terror because of some taboo or fear, and they desire peace of mind (soul). They don't want the leniencies of a Reform rabbi because he is not an authority for them."

Apparently, in the monochromatic religious landscape of Israel, everyone - secular and Orthodox - all agree that a Reform rabbi is not a rabbi.

posted by Helene  


8 Comments:

Ben said...

I totally agree Rav Goni. I have been following this story in The Forward, and have been frustrated with Israel. I just received AJR smicha this year. What does this mean for us? If Reform rabbis are not rabbis, i guess i am even less of a rabbi? This is very frustrating. By the way, who are you? Are you an AJR teacher, alum, or student?

Ben Newman

11:07 PM  
ravgoni said...

To answer the last question first - I am a rabbi affiliated with AJR. But details about me are less important than the issue of pluralism itself.
To respond to a couple of your points - You ask, "If Reform rabbis are not rabbis, I guess I am even less of a rabbi." I am not sure why you think that follows. Either you believe in your own rabbinate or you don't. But the point I think you are driving at is that being a rabbi is a two way street - there needs to be a community that accepts a person as a rabbi. So a person may be a rabbi as far as one community goes, while another community will refuse to grant legitimacy to that same person. (See my first entry, "It's a Pluralistic World," regarding Rabbi Haviva Ner-David.)
The other comment I want to respond to is your saying that you "have been frustrated with Israel." That sounds like a very broad statement. I am critical of many aspects of and players in the Israeli situation, but there is much to be proud and excited about in Israel, as well. In terms of pluralism, Israel's future is ambiguous: Is it the place where all streams will meet or is the place where pluralism will be stifled? Who will decide that question? What can diaspora Jews do besides look on an hope or be "frustrated with Israel"?
rav goni

8:37 PM  
Reb Rachmiel said...

I think there is another issue here.

Namely: the definition of the term "rabbi" is radically different in the Frum and Progressive Jewish worlds.

A rabbi in Monsey or Mea Sh'arim is a "decisor," someone who knows the law.

A rabbi in most other places is a "minister," who tends to the needs of a community -- emotionally, spiritually, mentally, intellectually.

If a Frum Jew wanted to know all the laws of say, erev tavshilin -- without any discussion of how the ritual affected or related to him -- I would send him to a Frum rav.

If a person is exploring different conceptions of G-d in Jewish history, or wants to discuss how Purim relates to coming out as a gay man, or wants to know how to make sure her consumer purchases can support Jewish economic values, I humbly submit that I would be a much better choice.

If I had my way, we would have two different terms. Perhaps something like "poseik-rabbi" and "madrich-rabbi."

The job of rabbi continually grows and varies throughout the Jewish world. That's why involving government in Jewish ritual is usually a bad idea.

1:24 PM  
Anonymous said...

Hello all, cool desing!
My site - [url=http://buy-soma-ins.blogspot.com]buy soma[/url] buy.
buy soma generic.
Thanks

5:24 PM  
Anonymous said...

Hello all, you are best!
http://viagra-online-it.blogspot.com
[url=http://viagra-online-it.blogspot.com]viagra[/url]
viagra
Regards

8:09 PM  
Anonymous said...

Hi, cool desing!
Look at this http://bb-viagra.blogspot.com
[url=http://bb-viagra.blogspot.com]viagra[/url] online
viagra buy
Thanks all

2:20 AM  
Anonymous said...

Hallo all, i found a lot of new information here!
http://viagra-online-it.blogspot.com
[url=http://viagra-online-it.blogspot.com]viagra[/url]
viagra
Regards

6:05 AM  
Jonah Rank said...

This is another instance of getting mixed up in the labels. Unfortunately, we're not all just Jews because history has associated us with different movements. We should just be Jews with varying practices. There's always been Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai or Akiva and Yishma'el or the Babylonian Talmud and the Palestinian Talmud or the Sephardic rite or the Ashkenazic rite... this whole time though, we've all been legitimate Jews. History can't stop because Movements have started.

I pray for a time when Israeli policy will recognize the unity of the Jewish people.

9:22 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home